Human Error. Does it really exist?
We have discussed wrong site surgery/procedure
(http://successinhealthcare.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/mark-site-campaign.html)
The equivalent for this in histopathology would
probably be labeling errors. Labeling errors could at the best lead to
rework/reprocess and at the worst result in wrong report with potentially
catastrophic effects on patients which can be as grim as wrong site surgery. In
most laboratories there are multiple checking steps within the process to
detect errors and prevent them leading to errors in reports that could harm
patients. In a busy pathology laboratory
in England in 2007 there were 113 slide and block labeling errors. By 2009
after a series of Kaizen events it dropped down to just 2 labeling errors
which would be a 98% improvement giving a short term six sigma score of 5.8.
What is interesting are the results of the root cause
analysis of the 113 pre-Kaizen. Most of them showed that human error as one of
the root causes. What is remarkable was the post-Kaizen improvement was
achieved with the same people. The root cause analysis of the 2 post-Kaizen
errors showed further opportunities for system improvement.
If system improvement can reduce or eliminate (well,
nearly eliminate in this example) human errors, the immediate logical obvious question
to ask is 'Does human error exist?'
Deming says that 80% of quality problems are caused by
management and 20% by employees. It is further thought that since the employees
are essentially a part of a system for which the management is responsible,
almost all quality problems are caused by management. Deming seems to have
taken the view that the focus and emphasis on quality has to be top down and
the creation and delivery of quality should be bottom up.
There are a number of areas where zero errors or quality
problems (or virtually zero errors) are possible. In the same pathology lab the
number of endoscopic biopsy request clarifications (which used to happen due to
doctors illegible handwriting) are now down to zero since the lab started
asking for a copy of the printed endoscopy report to accompany the specimen.
Previously it was thought that poor handwriting and not putting enough
information was a part of human error due to human fallibility, in practice it
caused arguments, distress and wasted time.
We are now beginning to question whether there is
anything called human error at all. As realists and practical professionals we
realise that there will be some areas where perhaps human error does exist and
possibly cannot be avoided but we believe that for people working within well
organised systems this should be a rare thing. We wonder if people with poor
training and no experience in quality methods who nonetheless think they are
capable of understanding quality improvement are unable to analyse with an aim
of system improvement and hence blame human error as a reason by default. After
all everyone has recognition and sympathy for the phrase 'to err is human'
We are having an emerging view that 'Human Error' as
an attribution for quality problems is a cop out clause used by poor managers
and weak leadership. It need not be so. However it requires managers and
leaders to shoulder the responsibility for building continuous quality
improvement into their work and the way their teams function. CQI systems are
already available and they have to be applied with patience and persistence -
those who do that will find the path of
continuous improvement and will eventually share this view of ours that 'Human Errors does not exist in organised systems' though it
may sound very radical right now.
M Hemadri & David Clark
Co-authors
David Clark is a Consultant Pathologist and National Clinical Lead, NHS Improvement. David's thoughts expressed in this blog post are his own personal views.
PS: Regular readers of this blog would have read a previous post about how we find designs which set us up for failure (not deliberately) and we then blame it on 'human error' http://successinhealthcare.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/blame-it-on-human-error.html
©M HEMADRI
Follow me on twitter @HemadriTweets
My mini e-book 'Standardised Management Conversation' is available - click http://www.amazon.co.uk/Standardised-Management-Conversation-Hemadri-ebook/dp/B018AWBJTU
till 31 December 2016 all my earnings from the sale of this book will be donated to charity http://successinhealthcare.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/standardised-management-conversation.html
3 comments:
Thanks, to post. In most labs there are several verifying techniques inside the approach to identify faults and avoid them leading to problems in reports that could injury patients. Today, scientist says, high quality issues are induced by management and less by employees. Market Research Reports
You are absolutely right Ross
Thanks for sharing, I will bookmark and be back again...
Private Healthcare UK
Post a Comment