CLINICAL WRONGOLOGY©
M. HEMADRI
Substantial activity in clinical medicine is not performed on the basis of clear unequivocal evidence
Substantial activity in clinical medicine cannot after care delivery find evidence to back it
Substantial clinical care is delivered incompletely
Substantial amount of errors are found in the delivery of care
Substantial numbers of clinicians are either unable or unwilling to accept the above
In
effect there is plenty or wrongness in theory, plenty of wrongness in
practice and blindness to wrongness in clinical medicine. The wrongness
is affecting patients by causing poor experience of healthcare,
avoidable complications and avoidable deaths. Clinical wrongness is also
affecting doctors and other clinicians causing variations in practice,
restriction in the ability to practice appropriately and punishments for
poor clinical performance.
There
will be a day in the future when clinical medicine will practiced on
the basis of proven science. We will truly rejoice on that day. Till
that day arrives clinicians will need an approach that will help in
appreciating, understanding and coping with the wrongness that is
prevalent. The study of that approach is Clinical Wrongology.
Clinical
Wrongology will remove the blindness to wrongness. It will make
clinicians appreciate that there is wrong, wrongness and errors
everywhere and these are normal to general life and clinicians are not
exempt from this. Clinical wrongology will then encourage clinicians to
cope with the wrongness around them and will show some methods to
practice within the wrongness atmosphere with a view to increasing
safety, quality and decreasing cost.
Clinical Wrongology, the new specialty in healthcare is now declared open.
Watch this blog as there will be more on this subject.
Clinical Wrongology, the new specialty in healthcare is now declared open.
Watch this blog as there will be more on this subject.
©M HEMADRI
Follow me on twitter @HemadriTweets
PS: While there are philosophers who
are masters on the subject of wrongness and great experts in the study of error, my inspiration for thinking
about wrongology and clinical wrongology was from 'Being Wrong', Kathryn
Schulz's brilliant book. Kathryn if you are reading this blog I hope
you do not mind me calling myself a Clinical Wrongologist, (perhaps the
worlds first and only one till date); having vainly given myself that
title I could be motivated to live up to it; unless I am totally wrong
on that!
NB: Persons in healthcare who want to be involved and contribute to this effort, please leave a comment with a means of contacting you or send a direct message to me on twitter.